Greece vs Montenegro: Deliberative Political Institutions Index

Greece
0.824
in 2025
Montenegro
0.813
in 2025
Greece rank
41st
Montenegro rank
44th

Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time

  • Greece
  • Montenegro
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Greece currently reports 0.824 against 0.813 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.011.

Across all 46 years both countries report, Greece has been ahead every year.

Greece ranks 41st and Montenegro ranks 44th of 175 countries.

Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Montenegro Difference Ahead
1900s 0.461 0.1756 0.2854 Greece
1910s 0.4487 0.171 0.2777 Greece
1990s 0.848 0.67 0.178 Greece
2000s 0.8541 0.7271 0.127 Greece
2010s 0.8948 0.7668 0.128 Greece
2020s 0.8558 0.7963 0.0595 Greece

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Greece or Montenegro?
Greece, at 0.824 against 0.813 in Montenegro as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Greece and Montenegro?
0.011, with Greece ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Montenegro?
46 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Greece and Montenegro rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
Greece ranks 41st and Montenegro ranks 44th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.