Ghana vs Spain: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Ghana
0.822
in 2025
Spain
0.833
in 2025
Ghana rank
42nd
Spain rank
39th
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Ghana
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 0.833 against 0.822 in Ghana, a difference of 0.011.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 124 shared years of data; in 1902 it was Spain ahead.
Ghana ranks 42nd and Spain ranks 39th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 4 and Spain in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.15 | Spain |
| 1910s | 0.14 | 0.293 | 0.153 | Spain |
| 1920s | 0.141 | 0.1428 | 0.0018 | Spain |
| 1930s | 0.1578 | 0.4244 | 0.2666 | Spain |
| 1940s | 0.2202 | 0.0672 | 0.153 | Ghana |
| 1950s | 0.4516 | 0.0729 | 0.3787 | Ghana |
| 1960s | 0.3773 | 0.1 | 0.2773 | Ghana |
| 1970s | 0.2876 | 0.408 | 0.1204 | Spain |
| 1980s | 0.2069 | 0.8988 | 0.6919 | Spain |
| 1990s | 0.6514 | 0.8991 | 0.2477 | Spain |
| 2000s | 0.9213 | 0.8962 | 0.0251 | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0.8672 | 0.8798 | 0.0126 | Spain |
| 2020s | 0.8302 | 0.8487 | 0.0185 | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Ghana or Spain?
- Spain, at 0.833 against 0.822 in Ghana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Ghana and Spain?
- 0.011, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Spain?
- 124 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and Spain rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Ghana ranks 42nd and Spain ranks 39th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.