Georgia vs Jordan: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Georgia
0.716
in 2025
Jordan
0.738
in 2025
Georgia rank
70th
Jordan rank
67th
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Georgia
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.738 against 0.716 in Georgia, a difference of 0.022.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.
Georgia ranks 70th and Jordan ranks 67th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Jordan in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.2305 | 0.4024 | 0.1719 | Jordan |
| 1930s | 0.091 | 0.433 | 0.342 | Jordan |
| 1940s | 0.0668 | 0.436 | 0.3692 | Jordan |
| 1950s | 0.222 | 0.4808 | 0.2588 | Jordan |
| 1960s | 0.3092 | 0.4586 | 0.1494 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 0.261 | 0.409 | 0.148 | Jordan |
| 1980s | 0.4229 | 0.4118 | 0.0111 | Georgia |
| 1990s | 0.3474 | 0.5616 | 0.2142 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 0.57 | 0.6042 | 0.0342 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.7352 | 0.6119 | 0.1233 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.7873 | 0.6732 | 0.1142 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Georgia or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 0.738 against 0.716 in Georgia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Georgia and Jordan?
- 0.022, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Jordan?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Jordan rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Georgia ranks 70th and Jordan ranks 67th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.