Georgia vs Israel: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Georgia
0.716
in 2025
Israel
0.711
in 2025
Georgia rank
70th
Israel rank
73rd
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Georgia
- Israel
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.716 against 0.711 in Israel, a difference of 0.005.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 98 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 70th and Israel ranks 73rd of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Israel in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.1144 | 0.0362 | 0.0782 | Georgia |
| 1910s | 0.2109 | 0.0984 | 0.1125 | Georgia |
| 1940s | 0.072 | 0.551 | 0.479 | Israel |
| 1950s | 0.222 | 0.551 | 0.329 | Israel |
| 1960s | 0.3092 | 0.5923 | 0.2831 | Israel |
| 1970s | 0.261 | 0.6605 | 0.3995 | Israel |
| 1980s | 0.4229 | 0.7677 | 0.3448 | Israel |
| 1990s | 0.3474 | 0.8 | 0.4526 | Israel |
| 2000s | 0.57 | 0.8035 | 0.2335 | Israel |
| 2010s | 0.7352 | 0.8021 | 0.0669 | Israel |
| 2020s | 0.7873 | 0.7905 | 0.0032 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Georgia or Israel?
- Georgia, at 0.716 against 0.711 in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Georgia and Israel?
- 0.005, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Israel?
- 98 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Israel rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Georgia ranks 70th and Israel ranks 73rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.