Gabon vs Syria: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Gabon
0.578
in 2025
Syria
0.589
in 2025
Gabon rank
97th
Syria rank
96th
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Gabon
- Syria
How they compare
Syria currently reports 0.589 against 0.578 in Gabon, a difference of 0.011.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 114 shared years of data; in 1910 it was Syria ahead.
Gabon ranks 97th and Syria ranks 96th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 7 and Syria in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.019 | 0.1041 | 0.0851 | Syria |
| 1920s | 0.019 | 0.1363 | 0.1173 | Syria |
| 1930s | 0.019 | 0.2155 | 0.1965 | Syria |
| 1940s | 0.14 | 0.2648 | 0.1248 | Syria |
| 1950s | 0.389 | 0.454 | 0.065 | Syria |
| 1960s | 0.4164 | 0.167 | 0.2494 | Gabon |
| 1970s | 0.286 | 0.0352 | 0.2508 | Gabon |
| 1980s | 0.286 | 0.034 | 0.252 | Gabon |
| 1990s | 0.6777 | 0.034 | 0.6437 | Gabon |
| 2000s | 0.7127 | 0.0543 | 0.6584 | Gabon |
| 2010s | 0.7697 | 0.0311 | 0.7386 | Gabon |
| 2020s | 0.6138 | 0.1493 | 0.4645 | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Gabon or Syria?
- Syria, at 0.589 against 0.578 in Gabon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Gabon and Syria?
- 0.011, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Syria?
- 114 years are reported by both, from 1910 to 2025.
- How do Gabon and Syria rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Gabon ranks 97th and Syria ranks 96th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.