Gabon vs Rwanda: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Gabon
0.578
in 2025
Rwanda
0.567
in 2025
Gabon rank
97th
Rwanda rank
100th
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Gabon
- Rwanda
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 0.578 against 0.567 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.011.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Gabon ahead.
Gabon ranks 97th and Rwanda ranks 100th of 175 countries.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.019 | 0.014 | 0.005 | Gabon |
| 1920s | 0.019 | 0.014 | 0.005 | Gabon |
| 1930s | 0.019 | 0.014 | 0.005 | Gabon |
| 1940s | 0.14 | 0.014 | 0.126 | Gabon |
| 1950s | 0.389 | 0.014 | 0.375 | Gabon |
| 1960s | 0.4164 | 0.2675 | 0.1489 | Gabon |
| 1970s | 0.286 | 0.2099 | 0.0761 | Gabon |
| 1980s | 0.286 | 0.277 | 0.009 | Gabon |
| 1990s | 0.6777 | 0.46 | 0.2177 | Gabon |
| 2000s | 0.7127 | 0.5562 | 0.1565 | Gabon |
| 2010s | 0.7697 | 0.5985 | 0.1712 | Gabon |
| 2020s | 0.6138 | 0.6005 | 0.0133 | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Gabon or Rwanda?
- Gabon, at 0.578 against 0.567 in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Gabon and Rwanda?
- 0.011, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Rwanda?
- 110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
- How do Gabon and Rwanda rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Gabon ranks 97th and Rwanda ranks 100th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.