Gabon vs India: Deliberative Political Institutions Index

Gabon
0.578
in 2025
India
0.574
in 2025
Gabon rank
97th
India rank
99th

Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time

  • Gabon
  • India
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 0.578 against 0.574 in India, a difference of 0.004.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 116 shared years of data; in 1910 it was India ahead.

Gabon ranks 97th and India ranks 99th of 175 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 1 and India in 11.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon India Difference Ahead
1910s 0.019 0.169 0.15 India
1920s 0.019 0.169 0.15 India
1930s 0.019 0.1946 0.1756 India
1940s 0.14 0.39 0.25 India
1950s 0.389 0.822 0.433 India
1960s 0.4164 0.8292 0.4128 India
1970s 0.286 0.833 0.547 India
1980s 0.286 0.92 0.634 India
1990s 0.6777 0.9299 0.2522 India
2000s 0.7127 0.9325 0.2198 India
2010s 0.7697 0.7889 0.0192 India
2020s 0.6138 0.5987 0.0152 Gabon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Gabon or India?
Gabon, at 0.578 against 0.574 in India as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Gabon and India?
0.004, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and India?
116 years are reported by both, from 1910 to 2025.
How do Gabon and India rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
Gabon ranks 97th and India ranks 99th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.