Equatorial Guinea vs Yemen: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Equatorial Guinea
0.107
in 2025
Yemen
0.111
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
165th
Yemen rank
164th
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 0.111 against 0.107 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.004.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 165th and Yemen ranks 164th of 175 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Yemen in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.055 | 0.0362 | 0.0188 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1910s | 0.055 | 0.0984 | 0.0434 | Yemen |
| 1990s | 0.156 | 0.4849 | 0.3289 | Yemen |
| 2000s | 0.156 | 0.4231 | 0.2671 | Yemen |
| 2010s | 0.1548 | 0.3147 | 0.1599 | Yemen |
| 2020s | 0.107 | 0.1118 | 0.0048 | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Equatorial Guinea or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 0.111 against 0.107 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Equatorial Guinea and Yemen?
- 0.004, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Yemen?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Yemen rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 165th and Yemen ranks 164th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.