Cuba vs Hungary: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Cuba
0.286
in 2025
Hungary
0.3
in 2025
Cuba rank
142nd
Hungary rank
139th
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Cuba
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 0.3 against 0.286 in Cuba, a difference of 0.014.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 142nd and Hungary ranks 139th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and Hungary in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.639 | 0.324 | 0.315 | Cuba |
| 1920s | 0.4685 | 0.3735 | 0.095 | Cuba |
| 1930s | 0.389 | 0.4013 | 0.0123 | Hungary |
| 1940s | 0.869 | 0.2636 | 0.6054 | Cuba |
| 1950s | 0.4241 | 0.045 | 0.3791 | Cuba |
| 1960s | 0.1323 | 0.0797 | 0.0526 | Cuba |
| 1970s | 0.1546 | 0.1893 | 0.0347 | Hungary |
| 1980s | 0.2197 | 0.2552 | 0.0355 | Hungary |
| 1990s | 0.179 | 0.7535 | 0.5745 | Hungary |
| 2000s | 0.198 | 0.6819 | 0.4839 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.2586 | 0.5051 | 0.2465 | Hungary |
| 2020s | 0.2933 | 0.3445 | 0.0512 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Cuba or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 0.3 against 0.286 in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Cuba and Hungary?
- 0.014, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Hungary?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Hungary rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Cuba ranks 142nd and Hungary ranks 139th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.