Croatia vs Togo: Deliberative Political Institutions Index

Croatia
0.697
in 2025
Togo
0.706
in 2025
Croatia rank
78th
Togo rank
75th

Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time

  • Croatia
  • Togo
00.20.40.60.8191619702025

How they compare

Togo currently reports 0.706 against 0.697 in Croatia, a difference of 0.009.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Togo ahead.

Croatia ranks 78th and Togo ranks 75th of 175 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 4 and Togo in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Togo Difference Ahead
1940s 0.0914 0.156 0.0646 Togo
1950s 0.2618 0.2626 0.0008 Togo
1960s 0.349 0.2151 0.1339 Croatia
1970s 0.349 0.087 0.262 Croatia
1980s 0.3941 0.087 0.3071 Croatia
1990s 0.2527 0.4722 0.2195 Togo
2000s 0.736 0.6296 0.1064 Croatia
2010s 0.742 0.7504 0.0084 Togo
2020s 0.701 0.7372 0.0362 Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Croatia or Togo?
Togo, at 0.706 against 0.697 in Croatia as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Croatia and Togo?
0.009, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Togo?
85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Togo rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
Croatia ranks 78th and Togo ranks 75th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.