Croatia vs Tanzania: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Croatia
0.697
in 2025
Tanzania
0.675
in 2025
Croatia rank
78th
Tanzania rank
81st
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Croatia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.697 against 0.675 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.022.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Tanzania ahead.
Croatia ranks 78th and Tanzania ranks 81st of 175 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.0914 | 0.024 | 0.0674 | Croatia |
| 1950s | 0.2618 | 0.027 | 0.2348 | Croatia |
| 1960s | 0.349 | 0.4227 | 0.0737 | Tanzania |
| 1970s | 0.349 | 0.483 | 0.134 | Tanzania |
| 1980s | 0.3941 | 0.5346 | 0.1405 | Tanzania |
| 1990s | 0.2527 | 0.6701 | 0.4174 | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 0.736 | 0.7332 | 0.0028 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.742 | 0.7643 | 0.0223 | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 0.701 | 0.7047 | 0.0037 | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Croatia or Tanzania?
- Croatia, at 0.697 against 0.675 in Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Croatia and Tanzania?
- 0.022, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Tanzania?
- 85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Tanzania rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Croatia ranks 78th and Tanzania ranks 81st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.