Croatia vs Mali: Deliberative Political Institutions Index

Croatia
0.697
in 2025
Mali
0.697
in 2025
Croatia rank
78th
Mali rank
78th

Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time

  • Croatia
  • Mali
00.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0.697 against 0.697 in Mali, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Mali ahead.

Croatia ranks 78th and Mali ranks 78th of 175 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 4 and Mali in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Mali Difference Ahead
1940s 0.0914 0.0913 0.0001 Croatia
1950s 0.2618 0.138 0.1238 Croatia
1960s 0.349 0.4642 0.1152 Mali
1970s 0.349 0.126 0.223 Croatia
1980s 0.3941 0.192 0.2021 Croatia
1990s 0.2527 0.7674 0.5147 Mali
2000s 0.736 0.8144 0.0784 Mali
2010s 0.742 0.7995 0.0575 Mali
2020s 0.701 0.7228 0.0218 Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Croatia or Mali?
Croatia, at 0.697 against 0.697 in Mali as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Croatia and Mali?
0, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Mali?
85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Mali rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
Croatia ranks 78th and Mali ranks 78th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.