Comoros vs Saudi Arabia: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Comoros
0.275
in 2025
Saudi Arabia
0.284
in 2025
Comoros rank
145th
Saudi Arabia rank
143rd
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Comoros
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.284 against 0.275 in Comoros, a difference of 0.009.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 80 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 145th and Saudi Arabia ranks 143rd of 175 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.0965 | 0.054 | 0.0425 | Comoros |
| 1950s | 0.1076 | 0.0696 | 0.038 | Comoros |
| 1960s | 0.1342 | 0.0944 | 0.0398 | Comoros |
| 1970s | 0.2722 | 0.1068 | 0.1654 | Comoros |
| 1980s | 0.4201 | 0.121 | 0.2991 | Comoros |
| 1990s | 0.573 | 0.1229 | 0.4501 | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.6418 | 0.186 | 0.4558 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0.5875 | 0.1935 | 0.394 | Comoros |
| 2020s | 0.3655 | 0.246 | 0.1195 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Comoros or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 0.284 against 0.275 in Comoros as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Comoros and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.009, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Saudi Arabia?
- 80 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Saudi Arabia rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Comoros ranks 145th and Saudi Arabia ranks 143rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.