Comoros vs Iran: Deliberative Political Institutions Index

Comoros
0.275
in 2025
Iran
0.284
in 2025
Comoros rank
145th
Iran rank
143rd

Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time

  • Comoros
  • Iran
00.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

Iran currently reports 0.284 against 0.275 in Comoros, a difference of 0.009.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Iran ahead.

Comoros ranks 145th and Iran ranks 143rd of 175 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 4 and Iran in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Iran Difference Ahead
1900s 0.0269 0.106 0.0791 Iran
1910s 0.0295 0.205 0.1755 Iran
1940s 0.0965 0.504 0.4075 Iran
1950s 0.1076 0.3018 0.1942 Iran
1960s 0.1342 0.0622 0.072 Comoros
1970s 0.2722 0.1113 0.1609 Comoros
1980s 0.4201 0.5438 0.1237 Iran
1990s 0.573 0.66 0.087 Iran
2000s 0.6418 0.691 0.0492 Iran
2010s 0.5875 0.5376 0.0499 Comoros
2020s 0.3655 0.317 0.0485 Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Comoros or Iran?
Iran, at 0.284 against 0.275 in Comoros as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Comoros and Iran?
0.009, with Iran ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Iran?
94 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Comoros and Iran rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
Comoros ranks 145th and Iran ranks 143rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.