Comoros vs Guinea: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Comoros
0.275
in 2025
Guinea
0.268
in 2025
Comoros rank
145th
Guinea rank
147th
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Comoros
- Guinea
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 0.275 against 0.268 in Guinea, a difference of 0.007.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 145th and Guinea ranks 147th of 175 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.0269 | 0.005 | 0.0219 | Comoros |
| 1910s | 0.0295 | 0.005 | 0.0245 | Comoros |
| 1940s | 0.0965 | 0.0182 | 0.0783 | Comoros |
| 1950s | 0.1076 | 0.0928 | 0.0148 | Comoros |
| 1960s | 0.1342 | 0.1304 | 0.0038 | Comoros |
| 1970s | 0.2722 | 0.097 | 0.1752 | Comoros |
| 1980s | 0.4201 | 0.0985 | 0.3216 | Comoros |
| 1990s | 0.573 | 0.3328 | 0.2402 | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.6418 | 0.2236 | 0.4182 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0.5875 | 0.2767 | 0.3108 | Comoros |
| 2020s | 0.3655 | 0.2227 | 0.1428 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Comoros or Guinea?
- Comoros, at 0.275 against 0.268 in Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Comoros and Guinea?
- 0.007, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Guinea?
- 94 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Guinea rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Comoros ranks 145th and Guinea ranks 147th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.