Cameroon vs Laos: Deliberative Political Institutions Index

Cameroon
0.216
in 2025
Laos
0.182
in 2025
Cameroon rank
151st
Laos rank
154th

Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time

  • Cameroon
  • Laos
0.10.20.30.4190019622025

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 0.216 against 0.182 in Laos, a difference of 0.034.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.2 times Laos's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Laos ahead.

Cameroon ranks 151st and Laos ranks 154th of 175 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 5 and Laos in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Laos Difference Ahead
1960s 0.085 0.315 0.23 Laos
1970s 0.085 0.2006 0.1156 Laos
1980s 0.1174 0.0802 0.0372 Cameroon
1990s 0.2611 0.1007 0.1604 Cameroon
2000s 0.3611 0.135 0.2261 Cameroon
2010s 0.3062 0.1708 0.1354 Cameroon
2020s 0.243 0.1872 0.0558 Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Cameroon or Laos?
Cameroon, at 0.216 against 0.182 in Laos as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Cameroon and Laos?
0.034, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Laos?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
How do Cameroon and Laos rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
Cameroon ranks 151st and Laos ranks 154th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.