Cameroon vs Eswatini: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Cameroon
0.216
in 2025
Eswatini
0.202
in 2025
Cameroon rank
151st
Eswatini rank
153rd
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Cameroon
- Eswatini
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 0.216 against 0.202 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.014.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.
Cameroon ranks 151st and Eswatini ranks 153rd of 175 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 4 and Eswatini in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.085 | 0.1287 | 0.0437 | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 0.085 | 0.1523 | 0.0673 | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 0.1174 | 0.1328 | 0.0154 | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 0.2611 | 0.1925 | 0.0686 | Cameroon |
| 2000s | 0.3611 | 0.2824 | 0.0787 | Cameroon |
| 2010s | 0.3062 | 0.3005 | 0.0057 | Cameroon |
| 2020s | 0.243 | 0.1973 | 0.0457 | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Cameroon or Eswatini?
- Cameroon, at 0.216 against 0.202 in Eswatini as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Cameroon and Eswatini?
- 0.014, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Eswatini?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do Cameroon and Eswatini rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Cameroon ranks 151st and Eswatini ranks 153rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.