Cameroon vs China: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Cameroon
0.216
in 2025
China
0.231
in 2025
Cameroon rank
151st
China rank
149th
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Cameroon
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 0.231 against 0.216 in Cameroon, a difference of 0.015.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cameroon ahead.
Cameroon ranks 151st and China ranks 149th of 175 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 2 and China in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.085 | 0.0642 | 0.0208 | Cameroon |
| 1970s | 0.085 | 0.0792 | 0.0058 | Cameroon |
| 1980s | 0.1174 | 0.4458 | 0.3284 | China |
| 1990s | 0.2611 | 0.4388 | 0.1777 | China |
| 2000s | 0.3611 | 0.5766 | 0.2155 | China |
| 2010s | 0.3062 | 0.5433 | 0.2371 | China |
| 2020s | 0.243 | 0.3427 | 0.0997 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Cameroon or China?
- China, at 0.231 against 0.216 in Cameroon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Cameroon and China?
- 0.015, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and China?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do Cameroon and China rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Cameroon ranks 151st and China ranks 149th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.