Cambodia vs Cameroon: Deliberative Political Institutions Index

Cambodia
0.22
in 2025
Cameroon
0.216
in 2025
Cambodia rank
150th
Cameroon rank
151st

Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time

  • Cambodia
  • Cameroon
00.10.20.30.40.5190019622025

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 0.22 against 0.216 in Cameroon, a difference of 0.004.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 150th and Cameroon ranks 151st of 175 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 4 and Cameroon in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Cameroon Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4137 0.085 0.3287 Cambodia
1970s 0.1235 0.085 0.0385 Cambodia
1980s 0.04 0.1174 0.0774 Cameroon
1990s 0.3796 0.2611 0.1185 Cambodia
2000s 0.4173 0.3611 0.0562 Cambodia
2010s 0.3037 0.3062 0.0025 Cameroon
2020s 0.2145 0.243 0.0285 Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Cambodia or Cameroon?
Cambodia, at 0.22 against 0.216 in Cameroon as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Cambodia and Cameroon?
0.004, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Cameroon?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
How do Cambodia and Cameroon rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
Cambodia ranks 150th and Cameroon ranks 151st of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.