Bulgaria vs Niger: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Bulgaria
0.779
in 2025
Niger
0.771
in 2025
Bulgaria rank
55th
Niger rank
58th
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Bulgaria
- Niger
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 0.779 against 0.771 in Niger, a difference of 0.008.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 55th and Niger ranks 58th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 5 and Niger in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.5309 | 0.103 | 0.4279 | Bulgaria |
| 1930s | 0.5475 | 0.103 | 0.4445 | Bulgaria |
| 1940s | 0.3095 | 0.103 | 0.2065 | Bulgaria |
| 1950s | 0.064 | 0.0982 | 0.0342 | Niger |
| 1960s | 0.061 | 0.151 | 0.09 | Niger |
| 1970s | 0.0754 | 0.1451 | 0.0697 | Niger |
| 1980s | 0.079 | 0.1633 | 0.0843 | Niger |
| 1990s | 0.9091 | 0.6369 | 0.2722 | Bulgaria |
| 2000s | 0.8765 | 0.7836 | 0.0929 | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 0.796 | 0.9035 | 0.1075 | Niger |
| 2020s | 0.8273 | 0.8457 | 0.0183 | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Bulgaria or Niger?
- Bulgaria, at 0.779 against 0.771 in Niger as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Bulgaria and Niger?
- 0.008, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Niger?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Bulgaria and Niger rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Bulgaria ranks 55th and Niger ranks 58th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.