Bahrain vs Cameroon: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Bahrain
0.182
in 2025
Cameroon
0.216
in 2025
Bahrain rank
154th
Cameroon rank
151st
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Bahrain
- Cameroon
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 0.216 against 0.182 in Bahrain, a difference of 0.034.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.2 times Bahrain's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bahrain ahead.
Bahrain ranks 154th and Cameroon ranks 151st of 175 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 3 and Cameroon in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Cameroon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.097 | 0.085 | 0.012 | Bahrain |
| 1970s | 0.3037 | 0.085 | 0.2187 | Bahrain |
| 1980s | 0.074 | 0.1174 | 0.0434 | Cameroon |
| 1990s | 0.1024 | 0.2611 | 0.1587 | Cameroon |
| 2000s | 0.4005 | 0.3611 | 0.0394 | Bahrain |
| 2010s | 0.1556 | 0.3062 | 0.1506 | Cameroon |
| 2020s | 0.182 | 0.243 | 0.061 | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Bahrain or Cameroon?
- Cameroon, at 0.216 against 0.182 in Bahrain as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Bahrain and Cameroon?
- 0.034, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Cameroon?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do Bahrain and Cameroon rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Bahrain ranks 154th and Cameroon ranks 151st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.