Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Daily protein supply of animal origin vs. plant origin

Papua New Guinea
31.66 grams per day per capita
in 2023
Zimbabwe
31.3 grams per day per capita
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
123rd
Zimbabwe rank
124th

Daily protein supply of animal origin vs. plant origin over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 31.66 grams per day per capita against 31.3 grams per day per capita in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.36 grams per day per capita.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 123rd and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 192 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 36.42 grams per day per capita 28.74 grams per day per capita 7.68 grams per day per capita Papua New Guinea
2020s 31.81 grams per day per capita 30.6 grams per day per capita 1.21 grams per day per capita Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher daily protein supply of animal origin vs. plant origin, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Papua New Guinea, at 31.66 grams per day per capita against 31.3 grams per day per capita in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in daily protein supply of animal origin vs. plant origin between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
0.36 grams per day per capita, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for daily protein supply of animal origin vs. plant origin?
Papua New Guinea ranks 123rd and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Daily protein supply of animal origin vs. plant origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Daily protein supply of animal origin vs. plant origin. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/daily-protein-supply-of-animal-origin-vs-plant-origin/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/daily-protein-supply-of-animal-origin-vs-plant-origin/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Daily protein supply of animal origin vs. plant origin</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Daily protein supply of animal origin vs. plant origin
Unit
grams per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Daily supply of protein from animal-based vs. plant-based products, measured as the average supply in grams per person per day. Protein of animal origin includes protein supplied in the form of all meat commodities, eggs and dairy products, and fish and seafood. Countries that lie above the grey line source a higher proportion of protein from animal-based than plant-based foods.