Indonesia vs Zimbabwe: Daily protein supply from animal and plant-based foods

Indonesia
29.97 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Zimbabwe
31.3 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Indonesia rank
127th
Zimbabwe rank
124th

Daily protein supply from animal and plant-based foods over time

  • Indonesia
  • Zimbabwe
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 31.3 grams of protein per day per capita against 29.97 grams of protein per day per capita in Indonesia, a difference of 1.33 grams of protein per day per capita.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Indonesia ranks 127th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 5.04 grams of protein per day per capita 11.45 grams of protein per day per capita 6.41 grams of protein per day per capita Zimbabwe
1970s 5.89 grams of protein per day per capita 12.62 grams of protein per day per capita 6.74 grams of protein per day per capita Zimbabwe
1980s 8.18 grams of protein per day per capita 10.51 grams of protein per day per capita 2.33 grams of protein per day per capita Zimbabwe
1990s 10.8 grams of protein per day per capita 8.85 grams of protein per day per capita 1.95 grams of protein per day per capita Indonesia
2000s 13.47 grams of protein per day per capita 10.95 grams of protein per day per capita 2.52 grams of protein per day per capita Indonesia
2010s 21.32 grams of protein per day per capita 28.74 grams of protein per day per capita 7.43 grams of protein per day per capita Zimbabwe
2020s 28.68 grams of protein per day per capita 30.6 grams of protein per day per capita 1.92 grams of protein per day per capita Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher daily protein supply from animal and plant-based foods, Indonesia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 31.3 grams of protein per day per capita against 29.97 grams of protein per day per capita in Indonesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in daily protein supply from animal and plant-based foods between Indonesia and Zimbabwe?
1.33 grams of protein per day per capita, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Zimbabwe rank globally for daily protein supply from animal and plant-based foods?
Indonesia ranks 127th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Daily protein supply from animal and plant-based foods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Zimbabwe: Daily protein supply from animal and plant-based foods. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/daily-protein-supply-from-animal-and-plant-based-foods/indonesia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/daily-protein-supply-from-animal-and-plant-based-foods/indonesia/zimbabwe/">Indonesia vs Zimbabwe: Daily protein supply from animal and plant-based foods</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Daily protein supply from animal and plant-based foods
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.