Hong Kong, China vs Trinidad and Tobago: Daily per capita fat supply

Hong Kong, China
108.77 grams of fat per day per capita
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
107.34 grams of fat per day per capita
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
75th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
78th

Daily per capita fat supply over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Trinidad and Tobago
6080100120140196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 108.77 grams of fat per day per capita against 107.34 grams of fat per day per capita in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 1.43 grams of fat per day per capita.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 75th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 78th of 192 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 90.96 grams of fat per day per capita 52.02 grams of fat per day per capita 38.94 grams of fat per day per capita Hong Kong, China
1970s 97.18 grams of fat per day per capita 56.32 grams of fat per day per capita 40.85 grams of fat per day per capita Hong Kong, China
1980s 117.61 grams of fat per day per capita 77.11 grams of fat per day per capita 40.5 grams of fat per day per capita Hong Kong, China
1990s 137.63 grams of fat per day per capita 70.11 grams of fat per day per capita 67.52 grams of fat per day per capita Hong Kong, China
2000s 136.04 grams of fat per day per capita 77.34 grams of fat per day per capita 58.69 grams of fat per day per capita Hong Kong, China
2010s 125.68 grams of fat per day per capita 97.21 grams of fat per day per capita 28.48 grams of fat per day per capita Hong Kong, China
2020s 120.16 grams of fat per day per capita 102.82 grams of fat per day per capita 17.35 grams of fat per day per capita Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher daily per capita fat supply, Hong Kong, China or Trinidad and Tobago?
Hong Kong, China, at 108.77 grams of fat per day per capita against 107.34 grams of fat per day per capita in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in daily per capita fat supply between Hong Kong, China and Trinidad and Tobago?
1.43 grams of fat per day per capita, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for daily per capita fat supply?
Hong Kong, China ranks 75th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 78th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Daily per capita fat supply. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Trinidad and Tobago: Daily per capita fat supply. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/daily-per-capita-fat-supply/hong-kong-sar-china/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/daily-per-capita-fat-supply/hong-kong-sar-china/trinidad-and-tobago/">Hong Kong, China vs Trinidad and Tobago: Daily per capita fat supply</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Daily per capita fat supply
Unit
grams of fat per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower. This is the total of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock.