Dominican Republic vs Thailand: Coverage (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban

Dominican Republic
6.5%
in 2021
Thailand
6.2%
in 2021
Dominican Republic rank
31st
Thailand rank
33rd

Coverage (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Thailand
02468200620132021

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 6.5% against 6.2% in Thailand, a difference of 0.3%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 31st and Thailand ranks 33rd of 35 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Thailand Difference Ahead
2000s 6.2% 4.5% 1.7% Dominican Republic
2010s 6.9% 5.1% 1.8% Dominican Republic
2020s 6.5% 6.2% 0.3% Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coverage (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Dominican Republic or Thailand?
Dominican Republic, at 6.5% against 6.2% in Thailand as of 2021.
What is the difference in coverage (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Dominican Republic and Thailand?
0.3%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Thailand?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
How do Dominican Republic and Thailand rank globally for coverage (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
Dominican Republic ranks 31st and Thailand ranks 33rd of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Coverage (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Coverage (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 364 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)