Dominican Republic vs El Salvador: Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Dominican Republic
45.0%
in 2021
El Salvador
40.2%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
5th
El Salvador rank
6th
Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Dominican Republic
- El Salvador
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 45.0% against 40.2% in El Salvador, a difference of 4.8%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 5th and El Salvador ranks 6th of 34 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.3% | 36.2% | 5.1% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 44.0% | 34.5% | 9.5% | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 45.0% | 38.1% | 6.8% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage (%) - all private transfers -rural, Dominican Republic or El Salvador?
- Dominican Republic, at 45.0% against 40.2% in El Salvador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coverage (%) - all private transfers -rural between Dominican Republic and El Salvador?
- 4.8%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and El Salvador?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and El Salvador rank globally for coverage (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Dominican Republic ranks 5th and El Salvador ranks 6th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)