Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural

Chile
11.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
8.3%
in 2020
Chile rank
26th
Kyrgyzstan rank
28th

Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time

  • Chile
  • Kyrgyzstan
510152025200620142022

How they compare

Chile currently reports 11.9% against 8.3% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 3.6%.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.4 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Chile ranks 26th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 28th of 33 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
2010s 10.8% 9.0% 1.8% Chile
2020s 25.0% 8.3% 16.7% Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coverage (%) - all private transfers -rural, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
Chile, at 11.9% against 8.3% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
What is the difference in coverage (%) - all private transfers -rural between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
3.6%, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for coverage (%) - all private transfers -rural?
Chile ranks 26th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 28th of 33 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 331 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)