Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Kazakhstan
45.6%
in 2021
Serbia
41.8%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
2nd
Serbia rank
5th
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 45.6% against 41.8% in Serbia, a difference of 3.8%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 5th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.7% | 54.7% | 30.0% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 37.2% | 43.9% | 6.7% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 45.6% | 45.2% | 0.4% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Kazakhstan, at 45.6% against 41.8% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 3.8%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Kazakhstan ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 5th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)