Chile vs El Salvador: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Chile
17.8%
in 2022
El Salvador
16.4%
in 2022
Chile rank
29th
El Salvador rank
31st
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Chile
- El Salvador
How they compare
Chile currently reports 17.8% against 16.4% in El Salvador, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 29th and El Salvador ranks 31st of 37 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.9% | 17.8% | 9.1% | Chile |
| 2010s | 25.0% | 16.9% | 8.1% | Chile |
| 2020s | 17.8% | 16.4% | 1.4% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Chile or El Salvador?
- Chile, at 17.8% against 16.4% in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Chile and El Salvador?
- 1.4%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and El Salvador?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Chile and El Salvador rank globally for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Chile ranks 29th and El Salvador ranks 31st of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)