Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Brazil
38.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
39.6%
in 2020
Brazil rank
12th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 39.6% against 38.9% in Brazil, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.8% | 21.5% | 20.3% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 40.5% | 37.7% | 2.8% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 35.9% | 39.6% | 3.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 39.6% against 38.9% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.7%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Brazil ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)