Argentina vs Poland: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Argentina
36.9%
in 2022
Poland
36.6%
in 2019
Argentina rank
13th
Poland rank
14th
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Argentina
- Poland
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 36.9% against 36.6% in Poland, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Argentina ranks 13th and Poland ranks 14th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.7% | 44.8% | 18.1% | Poland |
| 2010s | 37.7% | 36.9% | 0.8% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Argentina or Poland?
- Argentina, at 36.9% against 36.6% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Argentina and Poland?
- 0.3%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Poland rank globally for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Argentina ranks 13th and Poland ranks 14th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)