Mongolia vs Poland: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Mongolia
42.0%
in 2020
Poland
45.9%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
13th
Poland rank
10th
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 45.9% against 42.0% in Mongolia, a difference of 3.9%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 10th of 31 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.4% | 52.7% | 22.3% | Poland |
| 2010s | 34.4% | 49.6% | 15.2% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 45.9% against 42.0% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Mongolia and Poland?
- 3.9%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 10th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)