Brazil vs Serbia: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Brazil
50.5%
in 2022
Serbia
52.3%
in 2022
Brazil rank
8th
Serbia rank
7th
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 52.3% against 50.5% in Brazil, a difference of 1.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 8th and Serbia ranks 7th of 32 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 55.8% | 50.8% | 5.0% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 52.9% | 54.4% | 1.5% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Brazil or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 52.3% against 50.5% in Brazil as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Brazil and Serbia?
- 1.8%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Brazil ranks 8th and Serbia ranks 7th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)