Brazil vs Poland: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Brazil
50.5%
in 2022
Poland
45.9%
in 2019
Brazil rank
8th
Poland rank
10th
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Brazil
- Poland
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 50.5% against 45.9% in Poland, a difference of 4.6%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Brazil ranks 8th and Poland ranks 10th of 32 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.8% | 54.1% | 0.3% | Poland |
| 2010s | 56.4% | 47.5% | 8.9% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Brazil or Poland?
- Brazil, at 50.5% against 45.9% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Brazil and Poland?
- 4.6%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Poland rank globally for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Brazil ranks 8th and Poland ranks 10th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)