Belarus vs Brazil: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Belarus
53.2%
in 2019
Brazil
50.5%
in 2022
Belarus rank
6th
Brazil rank
8th
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Belarus
- Brazil
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 53.2% against 50.5% in Brazil, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Belarus ranks 6th and Brazil ranks 8th of 31 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.6% | 54.5% | 6.0% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 54.1% | 56.0% | 1.9% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Belarus or Brazil?
- Belarus, at 53.2% against 50.5% in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Belarus and Brazil?
- 2.7%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Brazil?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Brazil rank globally for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Belarus ranks 6th and Brazil ranks 8th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)