Ecuador vs Mongolia: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions

Ecuador
26.7%
in 2022
Mongolia
24.4%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
13th
Mongolia rank
16th

Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mongolia
0102030200720142022

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 26.7% against 24.4% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.3%.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 13th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 35 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mongolia Difference Ahead
2010s 17.8% 23.2% 5.4% Mongolia
2020s 28.8% 24.4% 4.4% Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions, Ecuador or Mongolia?
Ecuador, at 26.7% against 24.4% in Mongolia as of 2022.
What is the difference in coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions between Ecuador and Mongolia?
2.3%, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mongolia?
7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Mongolia rank globally for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory pensions?
Ecuador ranks 13th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 364 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)