Kyrgyzstan vs South Africa: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Kyrgyzstan
10.6%
in 2020
South Africa
10.1%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
26th
South Africa rank
27th
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- South Africa
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 10.6% against 10.1% in South Africa, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 26th and South Africa ranks 27th of 35 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.9% | 12.2% | 1.3% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 10.6% | 10.7% | 0.1% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -rural, Kyrgyzstan or South Africa?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 10.6% against 10.1% in South Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -rural between Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 0.5%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and South Africa rank globally for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 26th and South Africa ranks 27th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)