Brazil vs Mongolia: Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Brazil
36.0%
in 2022
Mongolia
33.8%
in 2020
Brazil rank
15th
Mongolia rank
18th
Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 36.0% against 33.8% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 15th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 37 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.0% | 30.1% | 4.9% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 36.2% | 34.0% | 2.2% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 34.3% | 33.8% | 0.5% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Brazil, at 36.0% against 33.8% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 2.2%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for coverage in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Brazil ranks 15th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)