Argentina vs Mongolia: Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban

Argentina
37.9%
in 2022
Mongolia
33.8%
in 2020
Argentina rank
13th
Mongolia rank
16th

Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time

  • Argentina
  • Mongolia
010203040200620142022

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 37.9% against 33.8% in Mongolia, a difference of 4.1%.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.

Argentina ranks 13th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 35 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Mongolia Difference Ahead
2010s 35.2% 34.4% 0.8% Argentina
2020s 38.6% 33.8% 4.8% Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coverage in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Argentina or Mongolia?
Argentina, at 37.9% against 33.8% in Mongolia as of 2022.
What is the difference in coverage in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Argentina and Mongolia?
4.1%, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Mongolia?
7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
How do Argentina and Mongolia rank globally for coverage in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
Argentina ranks 13th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 364 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)