Argentina vs Moldova: Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban

Argentina
37.9%
in 2022
Moldova
40.6%
in 2018
Argentina rank
13th
Moldova rank
10th

Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time

  • Argentina
  • Moldova
010203040200620142022

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 40.6% against 37.9% in Argentina, a difference of 2.7%.

That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 13th and Moldova ranks 10th of 35 countries.

Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coverage in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Argentina or Moldova?
Moldova, at 40.6% against 37.9% in Argentina as of 2018.
What is the difference in coverage in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Argentina and Moldova?
2.7%, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Moldova?
5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
How do Argentina and Moldova rank globally for coverage in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
Argentina ranks 13th and Moldova ranks 10th of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 364 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)