Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Brazil
49.2%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
52.4%
in 2020
Brazil rank
8th
Kyrgyzstan rank
6th
Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 52.4% against 49.2% in Brazil, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 32 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.2% | 30.4% | 9.8% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 47.4% | 41.8% | 5.6% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 38.7% | 52.4% | 13.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 52.4% against 49.2% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 3.2%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for coverage in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Brazil ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)