El Salvador vs Poland, Republic of: Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
El Salvador
37.4%
in 2022
Poland, Republic of
34.1%
in 2019
El Salvador rank
8th
Poland, Republic of rank
9th
Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- El Salvador
- Poland, Republic of
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 37.4% against 34.1% in Poland, Republic of, a difference of 3.3%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Poland, Republic of's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 8th and Poland, Republic of ranks 9th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Poland, Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Poland, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.2% | 34.6% | 1.6% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 33.6% | 35.7% | 2.1% | Poland, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers, El Salvador or Poland, Republic of?
- El Salvador, at 37.4% against 34.1% in Poland, Republic of as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers between El Salvador and Poland, Republic of?
- 3.3%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Poland, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Poland, Republic of rank globally for coverage in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- El Salvador ranks 8th and Poland, Republic of ranks 9th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)