Belarus vs Ecuador: Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban

Belarus
61.2%
in 2019
Ecuador
51.8%
in 2022
Belarus rank
1st
Ecuador rank
3rd

Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban over time

  • Belarus
  • Ecuador
204060200820152022

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 61.2% against 51.8% in Ecuador, a difference of 9.4%.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 3rd of 35 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Ecuador Difference Ahead
2000s 59.6% 18.2% 41.5% Belarus
2010s 60.0% 31.0% 29.0% Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coverage in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban, Belarus or Ecuador?
Belarus, at 61.2% against 51.8% in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in coverage in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban between Belarus and Ecuador?
9.4%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for coverage in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban?
Belarus ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 3rd of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 356 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)