Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Chile
9.1%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
8.4%
in 2020
Chile rank
29th
Kyrgyzstan rank
30th
Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 9.1% against 8.4% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Chile ranks 29th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.2% | 9.8% | 0.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 23.8% | 8.4% | 15.4% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Chile, at 9.1% against 8.4% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.7%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for coverage in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Chile ranks 29th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)