Belarus vs Ecuador: Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Belarus
61.3%
in 2019
Ecuador
58.5%
in 2022
Belarus rank
1st
Ecuador rank
2nd
Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 61.3% against 58.5% in Ecuador, a difference of 2.8%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 2nd of 35 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.8% | 16.8% | 46.0% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 62.6% | 34.0% | 28.6% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Belarus, at 61.3% against 58.5% in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 2.8%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for coverage in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Belarus ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 2nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)