Brazil vs Mongolia: Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Brazil
31.0%
in 2022
Mongolia
33.8%
in 2020
Brazil rank
16th
Mongolia rank
13th
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 33.8% against 31.0% in Brazil, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.8% | 25.2% | 7.5% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 33.8% | 35.8% | 2.0% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 29.1% | 33.8% | 4.7% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 33.8% against 31.0% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 2.8%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Brazil ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)