Argentina vs Poland: Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Argentina
33.6%
in 2022
Poland
40.0%
in 2019
Argentina rank
14th
Poland rank
11th
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Argentina
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 40.0% against 33.6% in Argentina, a difference of 6.4%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Argentina ranks 14th and Poland ranks 11th of 35 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.4% | 47.5% | 22.1% | Poland |
| 2010s | 33.3% | 41.1% | 7.8% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Argentina or Poland?
- Poland, at 40.0% against 33.6% in Argentina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Argentina and Poland?
- 6.4%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Poland rank globally for coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Argentina ranks 14th and Poland ranks 11th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)