Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Kyrgyzstan
55.2%
in 2020
Poland
48.2%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
5th
Poland rank
8th
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 55.2% against 48.2% in Poland, a difference of 7.0%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th and Poland ranks 8th of 32 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.2% | 54.9% | 25.7% | Poland |
| 2010s | 41.1% | 48.9% | 7.8% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 55.2% against 48.2% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th and Poland ranks 8th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)