Kazakhstan vs Uruguay: Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural

Kazakhstan
39.8%
in 2021
Uruguay
33.9%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
10th
Uruguay rank
13th

Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Uruguay
01020304050200720142022

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 39.8% against 33.9% in Uruguay, a difference of 5.9%.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 31 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Uruguay Difference Ahead
2010s 31.6% 38.0% 6.4% Uruguay
2020s 38.1% 43.5% 5.4% Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Kazakhstan or Uruguay?
Kazakhstan, at 39.8% against 33.9% in Uruguay as of 2021.
What is the difference in coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Kazakhstan and Uruguay?
5.9%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Uruguay?
7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
How do Kazakhstan and Uruguay rank globally for coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
32 places, 303 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)