Brazil vs Mongolia: Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Brazil
32.0%
in 2022
Mongolia
27.3%
in 2020
Brazil rank
16th
Mongolia rank
17th
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 32.0% against 27.3% in Mongolia, a difference of 4.7%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Brazil ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 33 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.2% | 37.0% | 8.8% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 31.8% | 29.8% | 1.9% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 29.0% | 27.3% | 1.7% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Brazil, at 32.0% against 27.3% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 4.7%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Brazil ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)